![]() ![]() jackdaniel: I think that it is useful because then it is easier to understand cases like this particular one Xach: pnp: what prompts this interesting exercise in not using defun? pnp: I mean that i get back an anonymous function ![]() slyrus_ quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) Xach: I think it is too angel-pin-head-dancy to be practically useful jackdaniel: it is just a convenient lie told by the implementation Xach: jackdaniel: that seems like an extreme position jackdaniel: functions doesn't have names no-defun-allowed: SBCL uses a SB-INT:NAMED-LAMBDA (iirc) to give a function a name. Xach: pnp: that doesn't seem likely to me! symbol-function does not normally return a symbol. no-defun-allowed: The difference in how the functions are printed is probably implementation dependent. The older releases prior to Erlang/OTP 18.0 were released under Erlang Public License (EPL), a derivative work of the Mozilla Public License (MPL).Pnp: while when i use defun i get the symbol that names the function Since Erlang/OTP 18.0, Erlang/OTP is released under Apache License 2.0. Erlang Solutions provides pre-built binary packages for Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, CentOS and other operating systems. So Erlang Solutions provides up to date pre-built packages for the latest stable releases. The OS provided packages tend to not contain the latest version of Erlang/OTP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |